Welcome and welcome my radio listening group of spectators and online article perusers. On this nineteenth day of October 2012 we will obviously be examining future innovation, future advancements, and cutting edge ideas. Undoubtedly, I without a doubt trust the Mayan schedule wasn’t right, or maybe those cutting it just came up short on stone basically, came up short on shake to etch on, hence the world will be spared from whatever it was that the Mayans pondered another age or reestablishment.
Alright along these lines, I’d like to jump into our themes for the present radio syndicated program and I’m certain at this point you comprehend the organization, fundamentally, “I will do the speaking for around 30 minutes less plugs and your main responsibility is to listen cautiously, concoct remarks and questions, and afterward I’ll open up the telephone lines to hear what you need to state.” As you likewise presumably realize I don’t react to online remarks which are not mentally based. That doesn’t mean you can’t have a supposition, nor does it imply that it must be equivalent to mine. Actually, on the off chance that you do a lot of wasting time going on and on, I will basically cut you off, maybe concur with you, and go to the following guest.
Our responsibility is to have a scholarly exchange, discourse, discussion and talk. That is for what reason you’re here, and that is my central goal, and we will finish it. Presently at that point, clearly there is a gigantic measure of discussion about development, the requirement for trailblazers and business people in our country to keep us solid, dynamic, and on the main edge of innovation. You won’t get any contradiction here on that reality, by the by it appears as though “advancement” is maybe one of the most abused words in the English language at present, maybe other than “unsustainable” which coincidentally, a few things which may have all the earmarks of being unsustainable or critical issues we accept we face today, however may in all likelihood be settled with the innovation of things to come.
Einstein used to state that; “it takes a splendid individual to take care of an issue, however it takes an inventive virtuoso to keep the issue from consistently happening in front of the pack,” and in this manner, I would state that the innovative prodigies don’t generally get the kudos for taking care of the issues, yet the splendid individual will, regardless of whether their past arrangements transformed into unintended results, and they are rehired to fix what they broke the first run through after probably fixing something to spare every one of us.
OK in this way, here is the place I’m going to begin tossing out subjects, with a little discourse appended to every one. They will run the array the whole way across the board from sci-fi points to the present best in class advancements and what they may mean for our future. I will likewise toss out some close to home unique inventive ideas, as I think of at any rate two new unique ideas for every day, and we can talk about those also in the event that you wish, or maybe you will have an alternate theme for our exchange here. Presently then we should start with the main theme;
1.) Will Physical Cash Endure the Following Three Decades – Programmers and Exchange Addressed
As a general rule, cash has practically no worth – consider a dollar note, it’s only an unstable bit of paper, so what amount is it extremely worth? We as a whole trust it merits whatever it says on the essence of it whether it be one dollar, five dollars, $10, $20, $50, or even a C-note. Cash works since individuals have confidence in its worth, and what it can purchase. The vast majority of the cash which is made nowadays never really exists in a physical structure, it just exists in the computerized world. For example, you may get paid from a Company, that cash could be carefully moved into your financial balance. You may then utilize your ATM to purchase something, or pay bills on the web, yet you never had that cash in your hot little hands. Things have changed a great deal over the most recent three decades haven’t they?
So what will occur in an additional three decades I inquire? Will regardless we have physical cash, or will everything be digitized, and will you ever have any cash in your wallet to purchase something? There are a few futurists that accept that cash will vacate the premises, in other words physical cash, and everything will be computerized later on. In any case, imagine a scenario in which our general public and human progress doesn’t confide in computerized cash. Imagine a scenario in which they are concerned that our banks are being hacked. As of late in the fall of 2012 we’ve noticed that our banks have gone under digital assaults from Iran in any event Leon Panetta accepts that is the place the assaults begun, however who is to state later on in the event that we have a war with another country that digital assaults on our money related framework won’t be incorporated?
All things considered, financial fighting is ending up very normal, why simply think about the authorizations, exchange wars, and our endeavors to prevent the cash stream from psychological militants, street pharmacists, tax criminals, and human dealers, alongside the focal financial PC frameworks of maverick country states and their cash moves for things like oil, regular assets, and military combat hardware?
At that point there is the issue at present where an ever increasing number of individuals are making portable installments on their versatile individual tech gadgets. Today they’re purchasing some espresso, a burger, or different things at retail locations. Later on it may be substantially more, or if that winds up untrustworthy or those individual tech gadgets are being hacked, maybe through downloaded applications with malware, or from clients surfing sites with malware, at that point individuals won’t confide in versatile installments. Some have proposed that some close to home tech gadgets may really return with pre-stacked entryways or programming that could be utilized by programmers to take information or carry out data fraud wrongdoings.
There may come a period where individuals don’t wish to purchase anything on the web, or do web based banking since they don’t confide in the framework, they don’t need their cash to vanish one day into another person’s record in some outside nation. Having somebody channel your ledger just needs to happen once, and just needs to happen to a dear companion or a relative before everybody they know ends up scrappy. All things considered you won’t have any desire to utilize advanced cash, and that case more individuals will pick to utilize physical cash, in this manner it is very conceivable that physical cash will exist essentially as a wellbeing factor for a considerable length of time to come.
However, how safe is your physical cash going to be if there should arise an occurrence of a catastrophic event, or a fierce blaze that torched your home, or a seismic tremor? Shouldn’t something be said about a storm with a colossal tidal flood, a tidal wave, or a noteworthy stream which bounced its banks? Is your physical cash safe, how much more secure is it that your computerized cash all things considered? Talking about catastrophic events and flooding occasions, perhaps we can all the more likely foresee them later on? How about we talk about that for a minute with our next point;
2.) We Need A Genuine Test for 100-Year Flood Numerical Reenactments – An Idea
How might we better deliver numerical reproductions for flood zones, or the notorious multi year flood? What would we be able to improve tweak these scientific models with the goal that they are totally exact? Loads of work has been done in the past dependent on rise, and flood mapping. Yet, there’s something else entirely to it than that, there are a wide range of different interesting points alongside disintegration designs. Give me a chance to give you an idea here?
We know the dates, temperatures, downpour fall, and run-off right, we know history, in addition to we quantified the territory when right? Along these lines, any great scientific reenactment for disintegration should look equivalent to the real in the event that you input the manner in which the landscape used to be with the break conditions to what it is presently. See that point.
There is an exceptionally intriguing YouTube Video I prescribe seeing on this theme, well a side issue, that of farming top soil disintegration; “Dave Montgomery – Earth: The Disintegration of Human advancements,” presently at that point, let me express my musings on this as, these hypotheses and hypothesis bode well with boundless models in the present time frame on littler scales – good judgment, detectable, and hence it bodes well, so at that point, Occam’s Razor endures.
Along these lines, my hypothesis of Dave Montgomery’s talk and hypothesis would be the equivalent. For sure, this was an incredible talk, strong proof, and research. OK thus, presently we would now be able to advance these discoveries to help align mathematic soil disintegration models and recreations. Presently then let me pose another inquiry, or maybe a similar inquiry an alternate way;
3.) Would we be able to Utilize Mathematic Fractal Recreation to Trick A Human When Survey Disintegration Examples?
Assuming this is the case, would that resemble the Turing Test? Also, provided that this is true, would i be able to call that the Augmented Simulation Winslow Test, named after me for thinking about it? On the off chance that you are a pilot as am I, and you fly over the landscape, you see different examples of how the mountains and disintegration had occurred throughout the last thousand to 10,000 years. You can see floodplains, mountains, gorge, and everything bodes well – you can see precisely how the water streams, or had streamed previously. Imagine a scenario where we utilized a PC to plan disintegration designs that never occurred, and consider the possibility that we asked a human, maybe a pilot who has seen and flown over such landscape ordinarily before on the off chance that it were genuine or not.
Are our PC reenactments sufficient to trick the human eye? I’m discussing a prepared eyewitness who has seen these things in the past again and again? Is that conceivable; I trust it is. Thus, how would you realize when seeing Google Earth on the off chance that you are taking a gander at a PC version, or a phony Birdseye see which maybe is concealing an army installation, or a mystery region? Actually you don’t, or isn’t that right? What about the individuals who work for the national satellite knowledge offices, where everything they do is study territory maps? Would they be able to select the distinction?
Before you answer that question, for what reason don’t you use Google Earth on the satellite view and fly over the deserts in Nevada. A portion of that stuff looks truly odd with unusual hues, however it’s everything genuine. On the off chance that you question that it’s genuine, feel free to fly over souther